With the growing popularity of televisions, the number of options to consider is increasing. From basic LCD TVs to one of the most modern Mobile LEDs, there is so much flexibility and utility on a show that choosing the proper one becomes quite difficult. Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Sony x800h with the Samsung q60t.
To make the decision a little easier, we selected two TVs representing two leading companies. In this post, we will compare the Sony X800H with the Samsung Q60T. Both of these televisions are good for specific exceptional features and are especially budget-friendly. If you want to purchase one of these two, you have to visit comparisonland.com and choose one of your favourites.
Which one is best Sony x800h or Samsung q60t?
Panel Technology
The Samsung Q60T, like some of the other Samsung TV types, employs VA panel technology. As previously stated, a TV with a VA screen often has a high native brightness level. Furthermore, the side viewing angle is inadequate. The Sony X800H, on the other hand, employs an IPS screen, except for its 75-inch and 85-inch variants, which also feature a VA panel. A TV with such an IPS panel, on the other hand, generally has an excellent side viewing angle, but a VA panel has a low side viewing angle.
Because the X800H uses various panel technologies in various settings, this comparison only applies to their version that has an IPS panel. However, the Samsung Q60T employs direct LED backlighting, whereas the X800H is dependent on screen size. It employs Edge Lit Led technology for its 43-inch and 49-inch models, and VA panel technologies for its 55-inch and bigger models. However, they both lack local dimming capabilities, which would enhance their game in a dark room.
Image Processor
The Samsung Q60T is supported by Quantum 4K CPU 4K Lite as its processor. Although this loses several functionalities available on higher-end processors such as the Q70T or above, it is capable of mastering HDR video, maximizing native picture quality, and coordinating colour. The Sony X800H, on the other hand, is enabled by X1 Engine family’s 4K HDR Processor X1. This processor, like the Q60T, lacks several functions that are available in X1 Extreme and X1 Ultimate engines. While not as strong as the greater model, this processing is capable of processing HDR photos, optimizing contrast, and orchestrating colour.
Smart TV Platform -Tizen 2020 Vs Android 8.0
The Sony X800H uses Android TV 9.0 Pie as its smart TV system, but the Samsung Q60T uses Tizen 2020 with fewer capabilities. Both of these smart TV platforms offer appealing and straightforward interfaces, but they are designed differently. Their UI is similarly slick and simple to use. However, when contrasted, the Q60interface T’s are clearer, whereas the X800H’s are smoother. In terms of app availability, they both featured a plethora of pre-installed apps such as VoD Service, browsing, Games, Live TV, and so on.
Tizen OS featuring Samsung Application Stores and Android TVs using Google Play Store are included as well as app stores with a large range of apps. They both now enable Home Smart Apps such as Amazon Alexa or Google Home, and others. Voice Navigation is already available on their smart TV platform. The Samsung Q60T is enabled by Samsung’s Bixby, whilst the Google Voice Assistant is available with the Q60R.
Remote – Sony X800H Vs Samsung Q60T
The Samsung Q60T comes with the Samsung Smart Controllers TM2020A as its primary controller, whereas the Sony X800H comes with Sony Voice Remote. The Samsung remote controller is small and has only a few keys, whereas the Sony Remote is huge and has several buttons. Nonetheless, both of their remotes contain an integrated microphone and a variety of voice control functions. Their voice commands will only work when they have been Bluetooth-paired with the TV. Both of these remotes may also be used to operate other HDMI CEC-enabled devices. Furthermore, with the Ambient OneRemote function on the Q60T Remote and IR Blast on the X800H Remote, these remotes may be programmed to operate other devices through IR. This is unquestionably highly useful for regulating other gadgets that do not use CEC. However, as previously stated, IR control requires a direct connection to the devices.
Back material:
It features a basic design toward the back that is entirely made of plastic. On the panel, there is a minor link containing two snare drums that are designed to attach the connections to the feet. Certain people may find this perplexing. The 43-inch and 49-inch versions feature a different back design since they use a different type of background illumination.
The back of the TV is made of plastic and has a polished look. It comes with incisions to attach the board to the feet. Ours were lost because they aren’t shown in the image. Because some of the sources of data are back-to-back, they may be more difficult to reach if the TV is vertically positioned.
Build quality:
This stunning TV looks to have a decent overall form quality. The entire television is made of plastic. There is a lot of flex all around bezels as well as on the rear at the information sources. There is also a significant amount of wobbling.
The design quality is excellent. It feels heavily contrived when there are no obvious flaws in the creation. The stand supports the TV effectively, however it wobbles somewhat when pushed.
Temporary image retention:
Even after displaying our elevated static test image for 10 minutes, there have been no signs of transitory image management, which is exceptional. It should be noted that temporary picture upkeep might differ between units.
There is no evidence of transitory picture cleaning, as there is on most VA boards; nevertheless, this may vary between units.
Hi there! I’m Sethu, your go-to guy for all things tech, travel, internet, movies, and business tips. I love sharing insights and stories that make life more interesting. Let’s explore the world together, one article at a time!
